Domestic or Foreign Policy Issue Essay Example for Free

Residential or Foreign Policy Issue Essay The political arrangement of the United States has it that the three parts of government are autonomous and parallel. In all strategy issues, both residential and outside, the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary work independently yet on the side of the other two. In the War on Terror of the United States of America the three parts of government have each a different job to do. The Constitution doles out to the President as Chief Executive, the main order of the military, matters identified with remote relations and the organization of the traditions that must be adhered to. He is conceded expansive forces, for example, in the Detainee Treatment Act, when the nation’s security is undermined and is in danger and as Vice President Dick Cheney stated, â€Å"the Bush administration’s exertion to keep the country safe†. The legitimization is to â€Å"maximize the activity of capacity to ensure the nation,† in light of the fact that in the War on Terror, the president is vested with the â€Å"authority to build up rules identified with both the detainment and preliminary of supposed adversary combatants† (Corn, 2008). Congress is the administrator of the country. Joint Resolution 23 or the War Powers Resolution of the two Houses of Congress, gave the President â€Å"specified methodology †¦ with respect to military activity of the United States †¦ [which is the] mindful strategy making that the Constitution doles out to the Congress† (Frye, 2002). The Courts are the last referees on inquiries of law, set forth plainly the Judiciary deciphers the Laws. In the War on Terror, the Supreme Court overruled both Congress and the President when it â€Å"struck down an arrangement of the Detainee Treatment Act that restricted the entrance to legal survey by prisoners in Guantanamo trying to challenge their grouping as foe combatants† and in another occasion when it â€Å"struck down affirmations of entire presidential power to set up rules identified with both the confinement and preliminary of supposed foe combatants† (Corn, 2008). In the War on Terror the three corresponding parts of government are completing their sacred orders, in their own free structures to guard the nation. References Corn, Geoffrey S. (2008, June 18). Boumediene v. Hedge and the Role of the Courts in the War on Terror. Recovered January 22, 2009 from http://www. worldpoliticsreview. com/article. aspx? id=2310 Frye, Alton. (2002, April 17). Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism. Board on Foreign Relations. Recovered January 22, 2009 from http://www. cfr. organization/distribution/4514/Swarns, Rachel L. (2008, December 21). Cheney Defends Bush on President’s Role. The New York Times. Recovered January 22, 2009 from http://www. nytimes. com/2008/12/22/us/legislative issues/22veeps. html? Mount, Steven. (2009, January 20). Sacred Topic: The Government. US Constitution Online. Recovered January 22, 2009 from http://www. usconstitution. net/consttop_govt. html