Analysis of Newspaper Article Essays

Analysis of Newspaper Article Essays Analysis of Newspaper Article Essay Analysis of Newspaper Article Essay Exerting day-to-day is good to a person’s wellness. While many people exercise for this ground. they are seeking methods to better endurance and public presentation. In an effort to offer lastingness and better endurance. athleticss drink makers have started to add protein to their merchandises. Sports drinks improve public presentation during drawn-out exercising because of two cardinal ingredients. saccharides and Na ( Preidt. 2006 ) . The saccharides provide the fuel and the Na AIDSs in keeping unstable balance. While athleticss drinks may be helpful during exercising. added protein may or may non increase public presentation. Gatorade and Accelerade athleticss drink companies sponsored two surveies to find if this is true. One survey thinks that adding protein additions public presentation. the other does non. Type of statistical process used Sometimes persons are cognizant of the experiment and may non be honest about the consequences from the trial. In this trial. experimenters were seeking to avoid the placebo consequence. The placebo consequence is when people improve because they think that they are having utile intervention ( Bennett. Briggs. A ; Triola. 2003 ) . To govern out the possibility of the placebo consequence. the jocks were told that some of the drinks will incorporate protein ; they were non told which 1s. The placebo consequence would change the trial and the consequences would be biased because the jocks would claim public presentation betterment. believing that their drinks contained protein. When utilizing a placebo. the jocks must cognize that the drinks may or may non incorporate protein. But. they must besides cognize that they will non be able to state the difference in gustatory sensation. The placebo appears to be the same but lacks the active ingredient ; in this instance there was no protein nowadays in some of the drinks. The participants were non cognizant of which drinks had protein. therefore their replies would more likely be existent. The surveies The surveies used 10 trained bicyclers to find if adding protein to athleticss drinks would increase public presentation and endurance. In the surveies. the bicyclers did non cognize which athleticss drink they were devouring. In both surveies the bicyclers were given one of three drinks. They were either given a regular athleticss drink. one with protein added. or a placebo. This test was taken on three different occasions. Findingss The Canadian survey. sponsored by Gatorade. found that adding protein does non better exercising public presentation ( Preidt. 2006 ) . Martin Gibala was the lead research worker for this survey. Of the three athleticss drinks. the consequences showed that athleticss drinks overall did better public presentation when compared to the placebo. But. the survey besides showed that the athleticss drink with the protein was no more good than the regular 1 ( Preidt. 2006 ) . Gibala states our survey shows that protein confers no public presentation benefit during? real-life’ exercising when jocks consume sufficient sums of athleticss drinks. While the Gatorade survey does non believe that protein additions public presentation. Accelerade’s survey provinces otherwise. Accelerade’s athleticss drink contains saccharides. Na. and protein. The jocks in their survey lost about 2. 5 per centum of their organic structure weight through exercise-induced perspiration. Harmonizing to the research workers for this survey. Accelerade with protein rehydrated the jocks 15 per centum better than those imbibing Gatorade and 40 per centum better than those imbibing apparent H2O ( Preidt. 2006 ) . Appropriateness of findings Because the bicyclers in the surveies were trained and all received the same drinks. I think that the consequences are inconclusive. Gatorade’s consequences province that adding protein does non better public presentation while Accelerade’s consequences are non given. Accelerade’s study merely states that its athleticss drinks rehydrate better. but does non turn to the issue of public presentation. I think that more research should be done and untrained jocks should be used every bit good. Because more than merely trained jocks consume these drinks. a broader group should be trialed. While the survey merely addresses those trained bicyclers. its consequences may differ for other jocks. Decision When analyzing the affects of adding protein to athleticss drinks. one must look at all factors. Factors include age. weight. strenuosity. and merchandise consumed. One must besides find if the protein really increased public presentation. While Gatorade made a conclusive determination. Accelerade did non. If an jock was traveling to do a determination on whether or non to buy a protein-infused athleticss drink. he or she would non be able to do a determination based on Accelerade’s research. Mentions: Bennett. J. O. Briggs. W. L. . A ; Triola. M. F. ( 2003 ) . Statistical concluding for mundane life ( 2nd ed. ) . Boston. MA: Pearson Education. Inc. Preidt. R. Health Day News. ( Aug 2006 ) . Studies Divided on Value of Adding Protein to Sports Drinks. Retrieved September 4. 2006 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. medicinenet. com /script/main/art. asp? articlekey=63522.